[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit article :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles Archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Ethical Consideration::
Registration::
Contact Us::
Site Facilities::
Webmail::
::
BCRC

AWT IMAGE

TBCC 9

AWT IMAGE

Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
:: General guidelines ::
 | Post date: 2017/05/2 | 

General guidelines

  • All of a journal’s content are subjected to peer-review.
  • Peer-review is defined as obtaining advice on individual manuscripts from reviewers’ expert in the field.
  • Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information.
  • Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author. No self-knowledge of the author(s) must affect their comments and decision.
  • Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments in 500 to 1000 words.
  • Reviewers may identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.
  • Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
  • Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
View: 952 Time(s)   |   Print: 182 Time(s)   |   Email: 0 Time(s)   |   0 Comment(s)
::
:: Checklists ::
 | Post date: 2017/05/2 | 

Checklists

To improve success rate of publishing articles, authors can have a look at these checklists which will be considered as a checklist by Reviewers in the review process.

Title

Description

Download

GENERAL

Checklist for all types of studies

Download Word

CONSORT

Checklist of information to include when reporting a randomized trial
Read More

Download Word

COREQ

Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research: a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups
Read More

Download PDF / Word

PRISMA

Transparent reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Read More

Download Word

STARD

Checklist for reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy
Read More

Download PDF / Word

STROBE

Checklist of items that should be included in reports of cross-sectional studies
Read More

Download PDF / Word

STROBE

Checklist of items that should be included in reports of case-control studies
Read More

Download PDF / Word

STROBE

Checklist of items that should be included in reports of cohort studies
Read More

Download PDF / Word

TREND

Non-randomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions
Read More

Download PDF

To study more about other checklists please refer to link bellow:

https://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/

View: 972 Time(s)   |   Print: 187 Time(s)   |   Email: 0 Time(s)   |   0 Comment(s)
::
فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی بیماری های پستان ایران Iranian Quarterly Journal of Breast Disease

Iranian Journal of Breast Diseases Accepted terms and conditions of:

Creative Common Attribution Committee on Publication Ethics: COPE World Association of Medical Editors International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 50 queries by YEKTAWEB 3991