Write your message
Volume 18, Issue 1 (Iranian Journal of Breast Diseases 2025)                   ijbd 2025, 18(1): 107-118 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR. MODARES. Rec 1397.207


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Roshandel S, Lamyian M, Azin S A, Mohammadi E, Haghighat S. Providing fertility preservation services in breast cancer patients and barriers to receiving them in Iran: A qualitative study. ijbd 2025; 18 (1) :107-118
URL: http://ijbd.ir/article-1-1125-en.html
1- Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran , solmaz44@yahoo.com
2- Department of Reproductive Health and Midwifery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
3- Reproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
4- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
5- Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (473 Views)

Introduction: Different methods of cancer treatment can lead to the destruction of fertility. Preserving fertility before starting treatment provides an opportunity for future fertility. This study aimed to explain how to provide fertility preservation services and the barriers to receiving them for breast cancer patients in Iran.
Methods: This qualitative study was conducted using the conventional qualitative content analysis method. Participants included service providers and breast cancer survivors who were purposively selected. Sampling continued until data saturation. Data were collected through the use of unstructured, in-depth interviews with participants. Data analysis was performed using the Granheim and Landman method (2004).
Findings: Data analysis led to the emerging theme entitled insufficient coverage of fertility preservation services in breast cancer patients. It means that despite access to different fertility preservation methods by the latest technology in the world, there are obstacles, such as lack of equal access to services, high costs, lack of insurance coverage, urgency in starting treatment, priority to save the patient's life, and lack of information to some patients, prevents some eligible people from receiving fertility preservation services.
Conclusion: Considering the importance of having children in improving the quality of life of breast cancer survivors, it seems necessary to remove the barriers to fertility preservation in breast cancer survivors.

Full-Text [PDF 455 kb]   (103 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation
Received: 2024/07/17 | Accepted: 2024/11/4 | Published: 2025/03/19

References
1. International agency for research on cancer. Islamic Republic of Source: Globocan 2022. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/364-iran-islamic-republic-of-fact-sheets.pdf. Accessed 2024.07.21.
2. Akbari ME, Sayad S, Sayad S, Khayamzadeh M, Shojaee L, Shormeji Z, et al. Breast Cancer Status in Iran: Statistical Analysis of 3010 Cases between 1998 and 2014. Int J Breast Cancer. 2017;2017:2481021. doi: 10.1155/2017/2481021. [DOI:10.1155/2017/2481021] [PMID] []
3. Nafissi N, Khayamzadeh M, Zeinali Z, Pazooki D, Hosseini M, Akbari ME. Epidemiology and Histopathology of Breast Cancer in Iran versus Other Middle Eastern Countries. MEJC. 2018;9(3):243-51.
4. Hong YH, Park C, Paik H, Lee KH, Lee JR, Han W, et al. Fertility Preservation in Young Women With Breast Cancer: A Review. Journal of breast cancer. 2023;26(3):221-42. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e28. [DOI:10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e28] [PMID] []
5. Salehpour S, Saharkhiz N, Hosseini S, Esmaeili S, Hajizadeh N, Majdi L, et al. Fertility Preservation: A Big Dilemma For Patients With Breast Cancer. Iranian Journal of Breast Diseases. 2024;17(1):116-38. doi: 10.61186/ijbd.17.1.116. [DOI:10.61186/ijbd.17.1.116]
6. Paluch-Shimon S, Cardoso F, Partridge AH, Abulkhair O, Azim HA, Bianchi-Micheli G, et al. ESO-ESMO fifth international consensus guidelines for breast cancer in young women (BCY5). Ann Oncol. 2022;33(11):1097-118. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.007. [DOI:10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.007] [PMID]
7. Starrs AM, Ezeh AC, Barker G, Basu A, Bertrand JT, Blum R, et al. Accelerate progress-sexual and reproductive health and rights for all: report of the Guttmacher-Lancet Commission. Lancet (London, England). 2018;391(10140):2642-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140 -6736(18)30293-9. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30293-9] [PMID]
8. Boutas I, Kontogeorgi A, Koufopoulos N, Dimas DT, Sitara K, Kalantaridou SN, et al. Breast Cancer and Fertility Preservation in Young Female Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Clinics and practice. 2023;13(6):1413-26. doi: 10.3390/clinpract 13060127. [DOI:10.3390/clinpract13060127] [PMID] []
9. Ulrich ND, Raja NS, Moravek MB. A review of fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer. Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology. 2022;82:60-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.01.004. [DOI:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.01.004] [PMID]
10. Komatsu H, Yagasaki K, Yamauchi H. Fertility decision-making under certainty and uncertainty in cancer patients. Sexual & reproductive healthcare: official journal of the Swedish Association of Midwives. 2018;15:40-5. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2017.12.002 [DOI:10.1016/j.srhc.2017.12.002] [PMID]
11. Ghaemi SZ, Keshavarz Z, Tahmasebi S, Akrami M, Heydari ST. Conflicts women with breast cancer face with: A qualitative study. Journal of family medicine and primary care. 2019;8(1):27-36. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_ 272_18 [DOI:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_272_18] [PMID] []
12. Ameri A, Novin K, Sourati A, Rashidi P. Awareness of Female Cancer Patients About the Risk of Impaired Fertility. Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology. 2019;8(3):342-8. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2018. 0112. [DOI:10.1089/jayao.2018.0112] [PMID]
13. Al-Zaben F, Al-Amoudi SM, El-deek BS, Koenig HG. Impact of maternal breast cancer on school-aged children in Saudi Arabia. BMC research notes. 2014;7:261. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-261. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-261. [DOI:10.1186/1756-0500-7-261] [PMID] []
14. Ghaemi SZ, Keshavarz Z, Tahmasebi S, Akrami M, Heydari ST. Explaining Perceived Priorities in Women with Breast Cancer: A Qualitative Study. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP. 2019;20(11):3311-9. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.11.3311. [DOI:10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.11.3311] [PMID] []
15. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2): 105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001] [PMID]
16. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research. 1994;2(163-194):105.
17. Kudjawu S, Agyeman-Yeboah J. Experiences of women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy: A study at Ho Teaching Hospital, Ghana. Nursing open. 2021;8(6):3161-9. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1029. [DOI:10.1002/nop2.1029] [PMID] []
18. Warner E, Yee S, Seminsky M, Lipson D, Glass K, Foong S, et al. Barriers to fertility preservation (FP) in a prospective pan-Canadian study of young women with breast cancer (YWBC). American Society of Clinical Oncology; 2019; 37(27): 136. doi:10.1200/ JCO.2019.37.27_suppl.136 [DOI:10.1200/JCO.2019.37.27_suppl.136]
19. American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2022-2024 Atlanta: American Cancer Society, Inc. 2022.
20. Madihi A, Nakhi Z. Familiarity with the Law on Family and Youth Protection. Behvarz Quarterly, 1401; 33(112): 12-3. [Persian]. doi: 10.22038/behv.2022.62700.1434

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Breast Diseases

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb