Enter your email address
Submit
Write your message
Volume 15, Issue 3 (Iranian Journal of Breast Diseases 2022)
ijbd 2022, 15(3): 4-17 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Golzarifard A, AllahBakhshi P, Loripoor M, Sayadi A R. Self-efficacy in Breast Self-examination and Satisfaction with Training in Face-to-Face and Smartphone-Based Training Methods: A Randomized Controlled Trial. ijbd 2022; 15 (3) :4-17
URL: http://ijbd.ir/article-1-946-en.html
URL: http://ijbd.ir/article-1-946-en.html
1- Imam Ali Comprehensive Health Service Center, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
2- Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health,school of Nursing and Midwifery, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
3- Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health,school of Nursing and Midwifery, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran ,marzeyehloripoor@yahoo.com
4- Department of Psychiatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
2- Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health,school of Nursing and Midwifery, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
3- Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health,school of Nursing and Midwifery, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran ,
4- Department of Psychiatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
Abstract: (1761 Views)
Introduction: Self-efficacy and people's satisfaction with breast self-examination training methods are very important in creating and perpetuating this breast cancer screening behavior. Therefore, choosing the most appropriate educational approach is important. The aim of this study was to Comparing the self-efficacy of breast self-examination and satisfaction with training in both face-to-face and smartphone-based training methods.
Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 70 women referring to the breast clinic in Rafsanjan were selected by available methods and by drawing samples assigned to two groups of face-to-face and smartphone-based training. Training was done in both groups individually. The training in the face-to-face group was through lectures with PowerPoint, and for the smartphone-based group by uploading a training video on WhatsApp. Data were collected before and immediately after the intervention through individual characteristics checklist, satisfaction questionnaire and self-efficacy questionnaire and analyzed by SPSS22 software and independent t-test, paired t-test, chi-square, analysis of covariance and Fisher's exact test.
Results: The mean scores of self-efficacy in the two groups of face-to-face and smartphone-based training, before the intervention were 22/57±4/68 and 20/68±5/08, and immediately after the intervention were 33/57±4/47 and 29/59±6/14, respectively. Satisfaction with training in the two groups of face-to-face and smartphone-based training was 173/78±7/18 and 166/46±17/86, respectively. Covariance analysis results showed a significant difference between the two groups in the degree of self-efficacy score (P = 0.007).
Conclusion: Both face-to-face and smartphone-based training methods provide satisfaction with training and create appropriate self-efficacy for breast self-examination, and face-to-face training has better results in this area.
Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 70 women referring to the breast clinic in Rafsanjan were selected by available methods and by drawing samples assigned to two groups of face-to-face and smartphone-based training. Training was done in both groups individually. The training in the face-to-face group was through lectures with PowerPoint, and for the smartphone-based group by uploading a training video on WhatsApp. Data were collected before and immediately after the intervention through individual characteristics checklist, satisfaction questionnaire and self-efficacy questionnaire and analyzed by SPSS22 software and independent t-test, paired t-test, chi-square, analysis of covariance and Fisher's exact test.
Results: The mean scores of self-efficacy in the two groups of face-to-face and smartphone-based training, before the intervention were 22/57±4/68 and 20/68±5/08, and immediately after the intervention were 33/57±4/47 and 29/59±6/14, respectively. Satisfaction with training in the two groups of face-to-face and smartphone-based training was 173/78±7/18 and 166/46±17/86, respectively. Covariance analysis results showed a significant difference between the two groups in the degree of self-efficacy score (P = 0.007).
Conclusion: Both face-to-face and smartphone-based training methods provide satisfaction with training and create appropriate self-efficacy for breast self-examination, and face-to-face training has better results in this area.
Type of Study: Research |
Received: 2022/01/13 | Accepted: 2022/06/8 | Published: 2022/10/18
Received: 2022/01/13 | Accepted: 2022/06/8 | Published: 2022/10/18
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
