Write your message
Volume 19, Issue 3 (Iranian Journal of Breast Diseases 2026)                   ijbd 2026, 19(3): 93-115 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Yudisthira D, Rico Abdul Karim M, Rahmanardi Muhammad A, Reva Aditya M, Okta Ardiansyah A, Andrianto A. Serratus Plane Block as Promising Pain Management in Breast Cancer Surgery: An Updated Meta-Analysis. , ijbd. 2026; 19 (3) :93-115
URL: http://ijbd.ir/article-1-1259-en.html
1- , dewanggay369@gmail.com
2- Medical Faculty, Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia
3- Oncology Surgery Department, Universitas Airlangga Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia
4- Oncology Surgery Department, Paru Hospital, Jember University, Jember, Indonesia
Abstract:   (372 Views)
Background: Postoperative pain remains common after surgery, and opioid-related adverse effects motivate multimodal alternatives. The serratus plane block (SPB) is used for breast surgery, but its comparative benefit remains uncertain.
Methods: We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and ProQuest for English-language randomized trials and cohort studies published between January 2019 and December 2024 comparing an SPB-related intervention with a control or another technique in breast cancer surgery. We used RoB 2 and ROBINS-I to assess risk of bias. Random-effects analyses assessed pain at postoperative time points; secondary outcomes included rescue analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and operative duration.
Results: Eight studies (834 participants) were included. Bias concerns were generally low to moderate, with concerns about blinding and cohort confounding. SPB usually favored lower time-specific pain, but heterogeneity was often very high, and some comparisons were not significant. Rescue analgesia was less likely (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08–0.72; P=0.01; I²=66%) and PONV risk was lower (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.12–0.80; P=0.02; I²=53%). Operative duration did not differ significantly (MD −3.69 min, 95% CI −7.52 to 0.14; P=0.06; I²=7%).
Conclusion: SPB may be considered as part of individualized multimodal analgesia, but heterogeneous protocols and limited evidence do not support universal superiority or routine use as standard of care.
Full-Text [PDF 2497 kb]   (121 Downloads)    
Type of Study: review | Subject: Diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation
Received: 2026/07/25 | Accepted: 2026/09/30 | Published: 2026/10/22

References
1. Rosenberger DC, Pogatzki-Zahn EM. Chronic post-surgical pain - update on incidence, risk factors and preventive treatment options. BJA Educ [Internet] 2022 [cited 2025 Dec 21];22(5):190-6. Available from: https://www.bjaed.org/action/showFullText?pii=S2058534921001530, [DOI:10.1016/j.bjae.2021.11.008] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Niyonkuru E, Iqbal MA, Zeng R, Zhang X, Ma P. Nerve Blocks for Post-Surgical Pain Management: A Narrative Review of Current Research. J Pain Res [Internet] 2024 [cited 2025 Dec 21];17:3217. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11456737/, [DOI:10.2147/JPR.S476563] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Paladini A, Rawal N, Coca Martinez M, Trifa M, Montero A, Pergolizzi J, et al. Advances in the Management of Acute Postsurgical Pain: A Review. Cureus [Internet] 2023 [cited 2025 Dec 21];Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372914420_Advances_in_the_Management_of_Acute_Postsurgical_Pain_A_Review, [DOI:10.7759/cureus.42974]
4. Sampognaro G, Harrell R. Multimodal Postoperative Pain Control After Orthopaedic Surgery. StatPearls [Internet] 2023 [cited 2025 Dec 21];Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK572072/
5. Shim H, Gan TJ. Side effect profiles of different opioids in the perioperative setting: are they different and can we reduce them? Br J Anaesth [Internet] 2019 [cited 2025 Dec 21];123(3):266-8. Available from: https://www.bjanaesthesia.org.uk/action/showFullText?pii=S0007091219304659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2019.06.009 [DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2019.06.009https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2019.06.009] [PMID]
6. Zhang Z, Wang JJ, Ping ZG, Jin XG, Yang JJ, Wang Y, et al. The Impact of Opioid-Sparing Analgesia on Postoperative Pain and Recovery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pain and Therapy 2025 14:5 [Internet] 2025 [cited 2025 Dec 21];14(5):1473-97. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40122-025-00762-2 [DOI:10.1007/s40122-025-00762-2] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Suo S, Liu R, Yu X, Wang J, Wang M, Zhang Y, et al. Incidence and risk factors of pain following breast cancer surgery: a retrospective national inpatient sample database study. BMC Women's Health 2024 24:1 [Internet] 2024 [cited 2025 Dec 21];24(1):583-. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12905-024-03430-3 [DOI:10.1186/s12905-024-03430-3] [PMID] [PMCID]
8. Szamborski M, Janc J, Rosińczuk J, Janc JJ, Leśnik P, Łysenko L, et al. Use of Ultrasound-Guided Interfascial Plane Blocks in Anterior and Lateral Thoracic Wall Region as Safe Method for Patient Anesthesia and Analgesia: Review of Techniques and Approaches during COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022, Vol 19, [Internet] 2022 [cited 2025 Dec 21];19(14). Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8696 [DOI:10.3390/ijerph19148696] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Capuano P, Sepolvere G, Toscano A, Scimia P, Silvetti S, Tedesco M, et al. Fascial plane blocks for cardiothoracic surgery: a narrative review. Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care 2024 4:1 [Internet] 2024 [cited 2025 Dec 21];4(1):20-. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s44158-024-00155-5 [DOI:10.1186/s44158-024-00155-5] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ [Internet] 2021 [cited 2026 Jan 13];372. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n71
11. RoB 2: A revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials | Cochrane Bias [Internet]. [cited 2026 Jan 13];Available from: https://methods.cochrane.org/bias/resources/rob-2-revised-cochrane-risk-bias-tool-randomized-trials
12. Perez-Herrero MA, Fajardo Perez M, Yamak Altinpulluk E, Ergonenc T. Usefulness of ultrasound-guided serratus-anterior block in prevention of postoperative pain after breast surgery. A cohort study. J Clin Anesth 2024;93. [DOI:10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111360] [PMID]
13. Bhan S, Mishra S, Gupta N, Garg R, Vig S, Thulkar S, et al. A Prospective Randomised Study to Assess the Analgesic Efficacy of Serratus Anterior Plane (SAP) Block for Modified Radical Mastectomy Under General Anaesthesia. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2021;49(2):124-9. [DOI:10.5152/TJAR.2020.13] [PMID] [PMCID]
14. Goel A, Palta S, Saroa R, Saxena P. Efficacy of serratus anterior muscle block as a part of multimodal analgesic regimen in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy. Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology 2020;28(2):125-30. [DOI:10.4038/slja.v28i2.8547]
15. Kaur U, Shamshery C, Agarwal A, Prakash N, Valiveru RC, Mishra P. Evaluation of postoperative pain in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy with pectoralis or serratus-intercostal fascial plane blocks. Korean J Anesthesiol 2020;73(5):425-33. [DOI:10.4097/kja.20159] [PMID] [PMCID]
16. Mazzinari G, Rovira L, Casasempere A, Ortega J, Cort L, Esparza-Miñana JM, et al. Interfascial block at the serratus muscle plane versus conventional analgesia in breast surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2019;44(1):52-8. [DOI:10.1136/rapm-2018-000004] [PMID]
17. Tang W, Luo G, Lu Y, Chen C, Liu H, Li Y. Application of a new serratus anterior plane block in modified radical mastectomy under ultrasound guidance: A prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth 2021;74. [DOI:10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110377] [PMID]
18. Qian B, Huang S, Liao X, Wu J, Lin Q, Lin Y. Serratus anterior plane block reduces the prevalence of chronic postsurgical pain after modified radical mastectomy: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth 2021;74. [DOI:10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110410] [PMID]
19. Bakeer AH, Kamel KM, Galil ASA, Ghoneim AA, Soud AHA, Hassan ME. Modified pectoral nerve block versus serratus block for analgesia following modified radical mastectomy: A randomized controlled trial. J Pain Res 2020;13:1769-75. [DOI:10.2147/JPR.S252539] [PMID] [PMCID]
20. Burton G, Masannat YA, Forget P. Non-Surgical Site Pain in Women following Breast Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Breast Care [Internet] 2023 [cited 2025 Dec 21];18(5):399. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10601695/. [DOI:10.1159/000531621] [PMID] [PMCID]
21. Parrott N, Tomlinson J. Perioperative analgesia and its influence on cancer outcomes. Dig Med Res [Internet] 2020 [cited 2025 Dec 21];3(0):16-16. Available from: https://dmr.amegroups.org/article/view/6083/html. [DOI:10.21037/dmr-20-45]
22. Southgate SJ, River GF, Herbst MK. Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Anterior Blocks. StatPearls [Internet] 2024 [cited 2025 Dec 21];Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538476/
23. Yesiltas S, Türköz A, Çalım M, Yılmaz S, Esen A, Daşkaya H, et al. Comparison of serratus plane block alone and in combination with pectoral type 1 block for breast cancer surgery: a randomized controlled study. Hippokratia [Internet] 2021 [cited 2025 Dec 21];25(1):8. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8877920/.24. Chen J qi, Yang X lu, Gu H, Chai X qing, Wang D. The Role of Serratus Anterior Plane Block During in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery. Pain Ther [Internet] 2021 [cited 2025 Dec 21];10(2):1051-66. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34537952/. [DOI:10.1007/s40122-021-00322-4] [PMID] [PMCID]
24. Mensah DK, deGraft-Johnson PKG, Darkwa EO, Akowuah A, Danso OS, Aryee G, et al. Perioperative Analgesic Effect of Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Breast Surgery: A Randomized Control Study at a Large Teaching Hospital in Ghana. Cureus [Internet] 2024 [cited 2025 Dec 21];16(6):e63397. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11283854/. [DOI:10.7759/cureus.63397]
25. White PF, Elvir-Lazo OL, Yumul R, Cruz Eng H. Management strategies for the treatment and prevention of postoperative/postdischarge nausea and vomiting: an updated review. F1000Res [Internet] 2020 [cited 2025 Dec 21];9:F1000 Faculty Rev-983. Available from: [DOI:10.12688/f1000research.21832.1] [PMID] [PMCID]
26. Maruthappu M, Duclos A, Lipsitz SR, Orgill D, Carty MJ. Surgical learning curves and operative efficiency: a cross-specialty observational study. BMJ Open [Internet] 2015 [cited 2025 Dec 21];5(3):e006679. Available from: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006679. 28. Andersen KG, Gunnarsdóttir SA, Steingrímsdóttir ÓA, et al. Risk factors for chronic pain after breast cancer surgery: a prospective study. J Pain. 2014;15(10):1055-1064. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2014.06.005. 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.06.005 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.06.005 [] [PMID]
27. Al-Dardery NM, Khaity AM, Albakri KA, Abdelsattar AT, Benmelouka AY, Lee T, et al. Preservation versus dissection of the intercostobrachial nerve for breast cancer surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024;86:1003-1011. doi:10.1097/MS9.0000000000001622 [DOI:10.1097/MS9.0000000000001622] [PMID] [PMCID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Breast Diseases

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb